| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
09/12/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; MAC DONAGH, P.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; BUSSONI, A.; RUBILAR, R.; DE LA TORRE, R.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; MURARA, M.; KANIESKI, B.; HALL, P.; YAO, R.; ADAMS, P.; KOTZE, H.; MONGES, E.; HERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ, C.; WIKLE, J.; ABT, R.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O. |
|
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA.; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina.; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; ADRIANA BUSSONI, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.; RAFAEL DE LA TORRE, ArborGen, Ridgeville, South Carolina, USA; ROGER LORD, Mason, Bruce, & Girard, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.; JIN HUANG, Abt Associates, USA; VITOR AFONSO HOEFLICH, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Paraná, Brasil; MAURO MURARA, Universidade do Contestado, Santa Catarina, Brasil; BRUNO KANIESKI, Universidade do São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brasil; PETER HALL, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand.; RICHARD YAO, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd., New Zealand.; PAUL ADAMS, Forestry Tasmanaia, Australia.; HEYNS KOTZE, Mondi Group, South Africa.; ELIZABETH MONGES, Universidad de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay.; CARMELO HERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ, Comisión Nacional Forestal, México.; JEFF WIKLE, TerraSource Valuation, Waxhaw, NC. USA.; ROBERT ABT, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA; RONALDS GONZALEZ, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.; OMAR CARRERO, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. |
|
Título : |
Global timber investments and trends, 2005-2011. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2014, 44(Suppl 1):S7. |
|
DOI : |
10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S7 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published: 26 November 2014. |
|
Contenido : |
Prior research in 2005 and 2008 estimated planted forest investment returns for a set of countries and included some natural forest species in a few countries. This research has extended those analyses to a larger set of countries and focused on plantation species, for seven years. This research serves as a "benchmarking" exercise that helps identify comparative advantages among countries for timber investment returns, as well as other institutional, forestry, and policy factors that affect investments. Furthermore, it extends the analyses to examine the effects of land prices, environmental regulations, and increased productivity on timber investment returns, as well as comparing timber returns with traditional stock market returns. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN; MADERA; RENTABILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5363/1/Balmelli.pdf
http://www.nzjforestryscience.com/content/pdf/1179-5395-44-S1-S7.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01882naa a2200433 a 4500
001 1054092
005 2019-09-20
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1186/1179-5395-44-S1-S7$2DOI
100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.
245 $aGlobal timber investments and trends, 2005-2011.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
500 $aArticle history: Published: 26 November 2014.
520 $aPrior research in 2005 and 2008 estimated planted forest investment returns for a set of countries and included some natural forest species in a few countries. This research has extended those analyses to a larger set of countries and focused on plantation species, for seven years. This research serves as a "benchmarking" exercise that helps identify comparative advantages among countries for timber investment returns, as well as other institutional, forestry, and policy factors that affect investments. Furthermore, it extends the analyses to examine the effects of land prices, environmental regulations, and increased productivity on timber investment returns, as well as comparing timber returns with traditional stock market returns.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
650 $aMADERA
650 $aRENTABILIDAD
700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V.
700 1 $aBUSSONI, A.
700 1 $aRUBILAR, R.
700 1 $aDE LA TORRE, R.
700 1 $aLORD, R.
700 1 $aHUANG, J.
700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V.A.
700 1 $aMURARA, M.
700 1 $aKANIESKI, B.
700 1 $aHALL, P.
700 1 $aYAO, R.
700 1 $aADAMS, P.
700 1 $aKOTZE, H.
700 1 $aMONGES, E.
700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ, C.
700 1 $aWIKLE, J.
700 1 $aABT, R.
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, R.
700 1 $aCARRERO, O.
773 $tNew Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2014, 44(Suppl 1):S7.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
24/04/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/11/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
ERRANDONEA, N.; FIERRO, S.; VIÑOLES, C.; GIL, J.; BANCHERO, G.; OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
N. ERRANDONEA, a Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal ?Dr. Alfredo Ferraris?, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay.; S. FIERRO, b Secretariado Uruguayo de la Lana (S.U.L.), Area de Transferencia de Tecnología, Montevideo, Uruguay.; CAROLINA VIÑOLES, Polo Agroforestal, EEBR, Universidad de la República, Cerro Largo, Uruguay.; J. GIL, d Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Polo Produccion Reproducci on de Rumiantes, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay.; GEORGGET ELIZABETH BANCHERO HUNZIKER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; J. OLIVERA-MUZANTE, Laboratorio de Reproduccion Animal “Dr. Alfredo Ferraris”, Departamento de Ovinos, Lanas y Caprinos, Facultad de Veterinaria, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Short term protein supplementation during a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol for timed AI in sheep. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Theriogenology, v. 117, p. 34?39, 2018. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.021 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Article history:Received 14 November 2017//Received in revised form 23 February 2018//Accepted 14 March 2018//
Available online 21 March 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) between groups (P > 0.05). Protein supplementation increased ovulation rate (1.30 ± 0.45 vs. 1.17 ± 0.40), prolificacy (1.18 ± 0.39 vs. 1.02 ± 0.16) and fecundity (0.94 vs. 0.77%; P < 0.05), but not non-return to service on Day 23 (83.8 vs. 81.7%), conception (82.9 vs. 78.8%) or fertility (79.1 vs. 75.2%; P > 0.05) in SE group. The supplement feed to PG15 ewes increased ovulation rate (1.35 ± 0.45 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), prolificacy (1.25 ± 0.43 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12) and fecundity (0.79 vs. 0.62%; P < 0.05) to levels comparable to SE + FF ewes (P > 0.05). The magnitude of the increase in ovulation rate in PG15 was greater than in the SE group (27 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). However, non-return to service on Day 23 (65.1 vs. 64.2%), conception (63.3 vs 61.5%), and fertility rate (63.3 vs. 61.5%; P < 0.05) remained similar in PG15 supplemented or not supplemented ewes. In conclusion, a short-term protein supplementation before cervical time artificial insemination improved the reproductive performance of ewes synchronized with the PG15 protocol to levels comparable to the SE group MenosAbstract:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) betw... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EWE; FERTILITY; FOCUS FEEDING; PROSTAGLANDIN; TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION. |
|
Thesagro : |
FERTILIDAD; INSEMINACIÓN ARTIFICIAL; OVEJAS; PROSTAGLANDINAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03637naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1058472
005 2019-11-04
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.03.021$2DOI
100 1 $aERRANDONEA, N.
245 $aShort term protein supplementation during a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol for timed AI in sheep.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Article history:Received 14 November 2017//Received in revised form 23 February 2018//Accepted 14 March 2018// Available online 21 March 2018.
520 $aAbstract: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reproductive impact of a short-term protein supplementation on a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol (two PG injections 15 d apart; PG15) for timed artificial insemination in sheep. During the breeding season, 437 multiparous Merino ewes grazing native pastures (forage allowance of 6 kg of dry matter/100 kg of live weight; crude protein: 10.8%, metabolic energy: 2.1 Mcal/kg of dry matter) were selected. Ewes were allocated, according to body condition score (3.2 ± 0.2) and body weight (40.6 ± 4.9 kg, mean ± SD), to a 2 × 2 factorial design: type of estrus ?spontaneous estrus (SE) or induced with PG15 (PG15)?, and supplementation (yes or no) before insemination (+FF; soybean meal at Days ?10 to ?3; crude protein: 51.9%, metabolic energy: 2.8 Mcal/kg of dry matter; average consumption 0.9% live weight/ewe/day of dry matter). All ewes were cervically artificial inseminated (Day ?2 to ?3 in SE ewes at estrus detection; Day 0 = timed artificial insemination in PG15 ewes). Ovulation rate on Day 7, non-return to service on Day 23, conception, fertility, prolificacy and fecundity on Day 60 were evaluated. Ovulation rate (1.17 ± 0.40 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), non-return to service at Day 23 (81.7 vs. 64.2%), conception (78.8 vs. 61.5%), fertility (75.2 vs. 61.5%) and fecundity (0.77 vs. 0.62) were higher in ewes from SE than PG15 group (P < 0.05). However, no differences were observed in prolificacy (1.02 ± 0.16 vs. 1.01 ± 0,12) between groups (P > 0.05). Protein supplementation increased ovulation rate (1.30 ± 0.45 vs. 1.17 ± 0.40), prolificacy (1.18 ± 0.39 vs. 1.02 ± 0.16) and fecundity (0.94 vs. 0.77%; P < 0.05), but not non-return to service on Day 23 (83.8 vs. 81.7%), conception (82.9 vs. 78.8%) or fertility (79.1 vs. 75.2%; P > 0.05) in SE group. The supplement feed to PG15 ewes increased ovulation rate (1.35 ± 0.45 vs. 1.06 ± 0.25), prolificacy (1.25 ± 0.43 vs. 1.01 ± 0.12) and fecundity (0.79 vs. 0.62%; P < 0.05) to levels comparable to SE + FF ewes (P > 0.05). The magnitude of the increase in ovulation rate in PG15 was greater than in the SE group (27 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). However, non-return to service on Day 23 (65.1 vs. 64.2%), conception (63.3 vs 61.5%), and fertility rate (63.3 vs. 61.5%; P < 0.05) remained similar in PG15 supplemented or not supplemented ewes. In conclusion, a short-term protein supplementation before cervical time artificial insemination improved the reproductive performance of ewes synchronized with the PG15 protocol to levels comparable to the SE group
650 $aFERTILIDAD
650 $aINSEMINACIÓN ARTIFICIAL
650 $aOVEJAS
650 $aPROSTAGLANDINAS
653 $aEWE
653 $aFERTILITY
653 $aFOCUS FEEDING
653 $aPROSTAGLANDIN
653 $aTIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION
700 1 $aFIERRO, S.
700 1 $aVIÑOLES, C.
700 1 $aGIL, J.
700 1 $aBANCHERO, G.
700 1 $aOLIVERA-MUZANTE, J.
773 $tTheriogenology$gv. 117, p. 34?39, 2018.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
